Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
tools:qc [2024/11/07 18:00] – will | tools:qc [2025/09/15 12:33] (current) – [QC: Quality Checking] will | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Various data have been manually/ | Various data have been manually/ | ||
- | * [[: | + | * [[: |
* [[: | * [[: | ||
- | * MT/noMT multi sequence quality and alignment checks ([[: | + | * [[: |
+ | * [[: | ||
+ | * [[: | ||
+ | * [[: | ||
+ | * fMRI prep: tracked using https:// | ||
+ | * [[: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Creating a QC protocol ===== | ||
+ | When creating a new document for collecting quality checking records | ||
+ | * use Pitt credentials on office365' | ||
+ | * provide a score (eg. 0-3), see [[# | ||
+ | * allow for optional annotations | ||
+ | * if possible, collect screenshots, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Scoring ==== | ||
+ | Here's an example rubric | ||
+ | ^ score ^ desc ^ | ||
+ | ^ 0 | bad data, cannot recover| | ||
+ | ^ 1 | processed failed, try rerunning| | ||
+ | ^ 2 | looks *okay* but if visit is outlier, check here again | | ||
+ | ^ 3 | process worked as expected | |